Review: The Plantagenets

The Plantagenets: The Warrior Kings and Queens Who Made England by Dan Jones. Viking. 2013. Reviewed from ARC from publisher. Vacation reads (aka, when I talk about books for grownups and post them before holidays.)

It’s About: The designated heir of England dies in a shipwreck; England is plunged into civil war as descendants of William the Conqueror fight for the right to the throne; and the winning family is the Plantagenets.

Starting with Henry II, son of Geoffrey Plantagenet and Empress Matilda, wife of Eleanor of Aquitaine, and father of Richard the Lionheart and King John, and ending over two hundred years later with his many times great grandson Richard II, The Plantagenets tells of the men, the women, the battles, the politics, the murders, the laws and even the finances that created and shaped both England and its relationship with its kings.

The Good: Didn’t you see the title? THE PLANTAGENETS! Henry and Eleanor and Richard, and, well, another Henry and some Edwards tossed in, also. And of course JOHN. We can’t forget him.

For those who aren’t captivated at The Plantagenets, I give you this: It starts with a mega disaster of epic proportions. The heir to the English throne is on his way home, along with friends and relations, and of course when you’re seventeen and the world is yours what do you do? You party like a rock star. The fatal flaw in that plan is when the crew of your ship parties with you, crashing the ship before it leaves the harbor, and the heir, his family and friends, and the ships crew, all drown.

No, really. The heir’s death results in a “who gets to rule” game; and any game for a throne is a game played out in blood, and death, and battles, and treachery, and loyalty. And that’s just the start of it.

The Plantagenets covers a lot of kings: Henry II, Richard I, John, Henry III, Edward I, Edward II, Edward III, and Richard II, and their wives, children, cousins; those loyal to them, those who turned against them. It ends on a cliffhanger of a sort: the defeat of Richard II by Henry IV, resulting in the end of the Plantagenet reign and the start of the House of Lancaster.

All these people in one volume is pretty amazing; it’s almost impressive that it’s “only” 500-odd pages. And let me add: it’s an intense 500 pages. Each of these men and women would warrant a book of their own (and yes, there is a “Further Reading” section for those who want to know more). Heck, specific events within the reign of any particular king would warrant an individual book. Jones does the impossible: providing a lot of information about people with the same or similar names in a way that is both clear and concise and at the same time explains the complexity of a situation. And he does that for an incredible time span. An ally is not just an ally: it’s the grandson of someone significant.

The amount of information in The Plantagenets means a careful reading is needed. I found The Plantagenets best read in chunks: I’d read about one ruler, then put it down for a couple of days. A family tree is included, showing the important people mentioned, as well as maps to help explain the battles being fought, especially those on the Continent as the Plantagenets repeatedly clash with the kings of France. Despite the length, sometimes I did want “more” and got a quick fix going over to Wikipedia to find out more about a particular person. I don’t think this is a bad thing: there’s a limited number of pages, and Jones made me care so much about the people he mentioned that I wondered about them and wanted “more.” Wanting “more” is a good thing in a history book, because it means the book has achieved its goal of getting the reader excited about the topic and hungry for information. (Also, I cannot be the only reader who wonders, have any of these families survived to modern times? Or did battles for property and titles result in the death of these powerful families?)

An example of something that gets mentioned that I want to know more about: money. Kings needed money to wage war. Tax too much, and subjects get unhappy, especially if they feel uninvested in the war. So, what do you do when you need money? Borrow. Don’t ask me why, but the idea of the kings of England borrowing money from Italian banking families stunned me. I had no idea. And that defaulting ruined those banks, which led to the rise of the Medici family. Seriously, I did not know this!

I knew this was a violent time, and I knew that it was a time when kings still fought in battles. That is why they were kings, after all. What The Plantagenets does is make those battles and that violence real. When people were fighting for power, it was actual fighting. It wasn’t through political manipulations or game playing at court. Or, rather, it wasn’t just that. A ruler couldn’t just talk, he had to actually go out and make stuff happen.

I’m only half-kidding about the book ending on a cliffhanger. This covers just the Plantagenets; Jones plans a book about the War of the Roses and the Tudors. I cannot wait for his next book, even though the more I read about the Tudors the less I like them. Henry VIII just seems like a bit of a poser next to all the Plantagenets, even the weaker kings.

In the meanwhile, I’ll be content with this one and with calling it a Favorite Book Read in 2013.

My only disappointment with reading the electronic ARC of this book is that it doesn’t have the eight pages of pictures that are in the hardcover. I know, I know — I’m not that silly person asking for a photograph of Alexander the Great. But, there are castles or ruins of castles; stained glass and tapestries; objects that have survived the centuries. I want to see these, so will be pursuing finished copy! (Note: I made an error about the lack of illustrations, and corrected this sentence to reflect that pictures appear in the final version. Sorry about that!)

Other reviews and interviews: Author interview at Library Journal; Open Letters Monthly.

Long time readers of this blog may remember that one of my favorite books from childhood is as A Proud Taste for Scarlett and Miniver by E. L. Konigsburg; it started a lifelong love of English history, helped along by films like The Lion In Winter. In my teenage years I read a lot of Jean Plaidy, loving the historic details that brought the time periods alive as well as the attention paid to the women in history. Another book I read in my late teens was Susan Howatch’s The Wheel of Fortune. I didn’t realize it when I began reading, but it takes the story of Edward III and sets it in the early part of the twentieth century, leading up to the 1960s.

So, here’s my question to you: what are some of your favorite books set during the Plantagenet period, from 1154 to 1399?

12 thoughts on “Review: The Plantagenets

  1. Oh! I was such a Jean Plaidy fan in my youth. Eleanor of Aquitaine has always been one of my favorite historical figures, so I’ll have to check out that Konigsburg book. Thanks!

    Like

    1. Let me know how you like the Konigsburg book. I confess to not having reread it as an adult, for fear I’d be disappointed.

      Like

  2. Oo! You made me want to read this long adult book! On top of how interesting you made it, while working in the Virginia Room as a sub, I recently discovered an ancestor who descended multiple ways from Prince John and some other Plantagenets. It suddenly made them *much* more interesting! Plus, one of my ancestors built my favorite castle! (Bodiam Castle in England) So I’d just been thinking I should read up on the family! And then you happen to mention this book….

    Like

    1. Sondy, that is so fascinating! I always wonder about the survival of families, through the hundreds and hundreds of years.

      Like

  3. Apparently there are tens of thousands of American descendants of Joan Beaufort. She was an illegitimate daughter of Prince John, later legitimized, but with the stipulation that none of her children would be in line for the throne. I have more than one ancestor where people claim they go back to royalty, but I found one definite ancestor, Anne Mauleverer, listed in a book called something like “Colonial Descendants of Plantagenet Ancestors” — and then it listed her pedigree. Of course those royals married each other and cousins multiple ways, so that one Colonial ancestor makes different branches of royalty my direct ancestors — something like 20 generations back.

    Mind you, a lot of the Colonial families had 8-12 children — so there are lots and lots of descendants. If I can get my line back to one of them, somebody somewhere of my thousands of “cousins” has probably researched it already.

    Anyway, once I found this link that looks like it’s real and substantiated, I’m suddenly so much more interested in the history of the British monarchy! It’s so funny what a difference that one little drop of blood (or part of a drop of blood!) does to my attitude — makes history all seem more real. Anne Mauleverer had ancestors in both the houses of York and Lancaster, so that’s suddenly more interesting, too.

    I’ll stop! I’ve really had fun looking into this when I sub in the Virginia Room, a few hours a week. (It’s to better help our customers, honest!) I discovered the library has The Plantagenets on audio, so I think I will try it that way. I’m not sure I could wade through it in print. Though I may find I want to pore over the relationships. Thanks for reviewing this right when I was interested! 🙂

    Like

    1. I love that book! And I’m looking forward to Jones’s next book, which will include Richard III

      Like

  4. As a middle-schooler I was enthralled by Anya Seton’s epic novel KATHERINE, about Katherine Swynford, mistress (for 20 years!) and ultimately third wife of John of Gaunt. I read the novel before I knew any of the history behind it, and would like to hunt it down for a reread.

    Like

    1. I will have to look for that; and I’m also wondering if maybe I read it? Because it sounds familiar, and John of Gaunt is someone I am so fascinated with.

      Like

Leave a comment